



The recent European Court of Justice (ECJ) Advocate General's opinion in case C-203/22 is an important development in addressing how companies using artificial intelligence (AI) can balance automated decision transparency with the protection of trade secrets, while complying with the requirements of the GDPR.

Recent events involving two tech titans, Elon Musk and Pavel Durov, have sparked global discussions about freedom of speech and the responsibility of digital platforms.




X's suspension of processing certain personal data for training its AI chatbot tool, Grok, following the order by the Irish Data Protection Commission, mirrors actions taken by the Garante, the CNIL, and the Hamburg privacy authority in the past months. How will developers and deployers of artificial intelligence systems react to this?


A new study reveals a lack of knowledge among employees about how to use AI, which runs counter to C-level expectations that it will boost productivity; but are these managers aware that AI training and internal rules are mandatory under the EU's AI Act and could save their companies significant risks?